THE LISTSERV IS FOR BANKRUPTCY ACADEMY
MEMBERS ONLY
To get on the Listserv, first join the Academy, then sign up for the listserv. The cost of joining the Academy is $10.95/mo. There is no additional cost to be on the listserv
FIRST JOIN THE ACADEMY

Then sign up for the Listserv

ABOUT THE BANKRUPTCY ACADEMY LISTSERV
You must join the Academy before you can get on the Listserv - CLICK HERE TO JOIN
WHAT IS THE LISTSERV?
EXAMPLES OF Q & A
COMMENTS FROM OUR MEMBERS
 
As a consumer bankruptcy professional and a subscribed member of The Bankruptcy Academy (BankruptcyAcademy.org) you get free membership in the Bankruptcy Academy Listserv.

This is a network of lawyers across the country, most of whom own and use one or more of Morgan King's books, and who practice consumer bankruptcy law under BAPCPA. However, even if you do not use King's books the Listserv has important benefits for consumer bankruptcy professionals.

BENEFITS

EYE ON CASES

The Academy's Eye On Cases will periodically send out on the Listserv directly to your PC briefs on important recent cases to help keep you up-to-date on emerging issues and case law developments.

SHARED MESSAGES

With one click you can send an email message to all of the members on the listserv, everywhere in the U.S. You may send all members news and cases you feel are noteworthy, and pose questions about points of law and procedure. Others may at their discretion respond to your postings, sharing their knowledge, experience and insight - see example exchange at right.

You may reply to a message sent by any other member. When you post your response or message it will automatically be sent to all other members on the list.

This is the greatest way to keep in touch with your professional colleagues across the nation. Learn from their experience, and share your own.

BOOK UPDATES

As a subscribing member, you will receive updates and announcements posted by Bankruptcy Media, referenced to the respective sections of Morgan King's books, including King's Guide to Practice, King's Discharging Taxes, King's Fees & Ethics in Consumer Bankruptcy Practice, King's Digest of BAPCPA Cases, and King's Legal Guide to Offers-in-compromise.

A LIBRARY OF ARCHIVED MESSAGES

All Eye on Cases updates, messages and responses are archived and may be searched by key word, topic, or member. This is a whole library of insightful information at your fingertips.

TO GET ON THE LISTSERV

1. First join the academy

To participate you must first join The Bankruptcy Academy. Membership is only $10.95 per month. You may elect to be automatically debited on a monthly or annual basis.

2. Then register for the Listserv

Once you have join the Academy, go to the Members' Only page using your I.D. and password, and click on "Register For the Listserv" link. There is no additional charge for registration on the listserv.

"You have given us a forum in which we can compare results in different districts. I think that subscribing and participating in Morgan King's List Serve is a necessary part of the due diligence required of all bankruptcy attorneys. Plus it helped me win a case that everyone though was not winable. Keep it up." - Marguerite Kirk, Board Certified Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney, Bedford, TX

 TIPS ON USING A LISTSERV

By Steven G. Klesner,Iowa City, IA

Some people don't like to read all of those listserv messages that can overwhelm the inbox.  I'll pass on a few tricks I learned in being on the NACBA listserv that kept my inbox from getting jammed up, and turned those messages into a quick issue primer.

1. Create a subfolder to the inbox.  Make a rule that all messages coming from "AcademyListserv" get immediately shunted to that folder.

2. If you aren't using it already, go to Google's website and download the free Google Desktop application.  It will index your hard drive, and even does network drives.  All of your emails will get indexed as well.

3. When you want to research an issue, open Google Desktop, and to search discussions on the listserv on, say, §1328 issues, type in "UpdateForum" and "1328."

It did not take long before I had tens of thousands of NACBA messages.  They did not clog my inbox.  I could find insightful discussions of all sorts of topics this way.

 

EXAMPLES OF EXCHANGES ON THE LISTSERV

A LIST-MEMBER SUBMITTED THIS QUESTION:

1. Above median Income Debtor does not pass means test so he files a Chapter 13 (5 year plan). Has 35K in credit cards. He has the income to pay 100% to the unsecured creditors. The automatic stay stops the pending foreclosure on his home. His intent however is to surrender his home which is encumbered by a 1st and 2nd mortgage totaling $390K. At the time of the 341 meeting the bank has not yet foreclosed but we expect them to in the near future so we do not know what the deficiency will be. At some point we will need to amend his Chapter 13 Plan to account for the mortgage deficiency. Both mortgagees filed a Proof of Claim. Should an objection to the proof of claim be filed? If no objection is filed, will the Debtor be bound by the amount listed in the Proof of Claim filed by the mortgagees or just for the amount of the mortgage deficiency?

What if the bank does not foreclosure for say 10 months and there is a large deficiency that the debtor will not be able to pay during the remaining term of the plan???

2. Has anyone had a client who stated his/her intention to reaffirm a car loan but then decided not to? Debtor is current but the creditor is insisting that they can repossess the car (Massachusetts) because the debtor is in default under the terms of the original agreement by filing bankruptcy.

ANOTHER MEMBER REPLIED:

Hello-

I'll respond to both parts, but I am anxious to learn about everyone's state law as to the second part.

1. Your plan would provide that you would surrender the house to the mortgage companies. Then, to the extent there is any unsecured deficiency (and the POC should reflect this), they would share with other unsecured creditors. It would no longer be a 100% plan, but your client would be discharged for the balance at the plan's completion in 5 years. I don't see where an amendment is needed.

What if the bank does not foreclosure for say 10 months and there is a large deficiency that the debtor will not be able to pay during the remaining term of the plan???

If the POCs are filed as "secured" and your plan is surrendering the house, I don't know why your debtor would have to pay the deficiency.

2. Has anyone had a client who stated his/her intention to reaffirm a car loan but then decided not to?  Debtor is current but the creditor is insisting that they can repossess the car (Massachusetts) because the debtor is in default under the terms of the original agreement by filing bankruptcy.

That's what some car lenders are doing in Colorado. I thought someone posted here that Massachusetts had a law that merely filing bankruptcy, without more, can not be considered a default to permit repossession, notwithstanding contract terms. Does anyone have a state law like this?

ANOTHER ATTORNEY ADDED:

Responding to the first question, in the Western District of Missouri, I would state in the plan that the real estate is being surrendered "in lieu of entire debt.” The form plan used by the chapter 13 trustee has a place to mark this for any secured claim where the collateral is being surrendered.  There is also a Missouri (pre BAPCPA) case holding that if the creditor does not object to the plan, the creditor will not be paid a deficiency regardless of what proof of claim the creditor files.  That is how the chapter 13 trustee treats this today.  The trustee goes by the plan if there is no objection and does not pay any deficiency.  It doesn't matter if the creditor waits several months to foreclose, and then has a deficiency.  If you can do this, you will still be able to have a 100% plan.

Regarding the second question, I recently posted a response regarding a Missouri statute that requires a creditor to show that the creditor's ability to realize upon the collateral is "significantly impaired" before it can repossess a vehicle, regardless of whether the creditor has an ipso facto clause in the loan documents.The statute is 408.552 RSMo, and the bankruptcy case that cited this is In re Riggs out of the Western District of Missouri.   According to that case, so long as the debtor keeps the payments current, even if no reaffirmation agreement was filed, the creditor must go by state law.  Under state law, simply filing bankruptcy is not enough to allow the creditor to repossess.

AN ATTORNEY SUBMITTED THIS QUESTION:

What can be done if one inadvertently files a barebones petition before the debtors' receive their credit counseling? Voluntary dismiss and refile? Post petition counseling certificate filed immediately?  Any suggestions or help?  No foreclosure or unlawful detainer pending, no creditor prejudiced by the filing.

Escondido, CA

AN ATTORNEY RESPONDED:

Let case be dismissed. File motion to shorten prejudice period.

North Miami Beach, Florida

ANOTHER ATTORNEY ADDED:

I would let the case be dismissed and then file another one.  At the same time the case is filed, I would file a motion to extend the automatic stay under section 362(c) (with notice to creditors).  That needs to be done at the same time as the case is filed since otherwise the stay will end after 30 days, and creditors need a 30-day notice regarding the motion.  I had this happen in a case that had originally been filed by another attorney and the counseling certificate was outdated by the time the case was filed.  The case was automatically dismissed by the court.  We filed the new case within a year, along with the motion, and the judge allowed the stay to remain in effect.

 Columbia, MO 

 

 

  JOIN THE ACADEMY

 

"This is a great tool for my practice." - Attorney, Saint Joseph, Missouri 

"Thank you very much for your prompt responses to my pre-filing claim/post-filing judgment question. As a solo, it is so terrific to be able to get some ideas and opinions so quickly. Thank you for your generosity." - Attorney, Charlottesville, VA

"In the past week, several topics have provided me with much needed guidance." - Attorney, Phoenix, AZ

"Thanks for all the past information and I am looking forward to continued service.  I read all of the responses and emails.” - Attorney, East Alton, IL

"It is definitely a worthwhile service." - Attorney, Shawnee, KS

 "I find the listserv VERY helpful" - Attorney, Charlottesville, VA

"You have given us a forum in which we can compare results in different districts. I think that subscribing and participating in Morgan King's List Serve is a necessary part of the due diligence required of all bankruptcy attorneys. Plus it helped me win a case that everyone though was not winable. Keep it up." - Attorney, Board Certified Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney, Bedford, TX